Q. Bond order of \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \).

Answer

For \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \): each F has \(7\) valence electrons, so total is \(14+1=15\) valence electrons.

In \( \mathrm{F_2} \), the ordering up to the \( \pi \) orbitals is:
\(\sigma_{2s},\ \sigma_{2s}^*,\ (\pi_{2p}),\ \sigma_{2p},\ (\pi_{2p}^* )\).
The electron removal in \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \) comes from the highest occupied level, the bonding \( \pi_{2p} \) set.

Counting electrons gives: bonding electrons \(=8\), antibonding electrons \(=7\).

Bond order \(= \dfrac{1}{2}(8-7)=\dfrac{1}{2}=0.5\).

Final result: \( \dfrac{1}{2} \).

Detailed Explanation

We want the bond order of the ion \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \). The key idea is to compare how many electrons occupy the bonding and antibonding molecular orbitals for fluorine.

Step 1: Write the electronic configuration for the molecule

Each fluorine atom has 7 valence electrons. Molecular orbital theory uses all valence electrons when finding bond order for main-group diatomics.

So for \( \mathrm{F_2} \):

  • \(7 + 7 = 14\) valence electrons

For \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \), we remove one electron (because of the \(+\) charge):

  • \(14 – 1 = 13\) valence electrons

Step 2: Determine the molecular orbital filling (for \( \mathrm{F_2} \) framework)

The ordering for \( \mathrm{F_2} \) (and lighter halogens) is typically:

  • \(\sigma 2s\)
  • \(\sigma^{\ast} 2s\)
  • \(\pi 2p\)
  • \(\sigma 2p\)
  • \(\pi^{\ast} 2p\)
  • \(\sigma^{\ast} 2p\)

We can summarize the electron count by placing electrons into the standard valence MO set for \( \mathrm{F_2} \), then remove one for \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \).

For \( \mathrm{F_2} \) (14 valence electrons)

  • \(\sigma 2s\): 2 electrons
  • \(\sigma^{\ast} 2s\): 2 electrons
  • \(\pi 2p\): 4 electrons
  • \(\sigma 2p\): 2 electrons
  • \(\pi^{\ast} 2p\): 4 electrons

That accounts for \(2 + 2 + 4 + 2 + 4 = 14\).

Now create \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \) (13 valence electrons)

Remove one electron from the highest-energy occupied orbital in \( \mathrm{F_2} \).

In \( \mathrm{F_2} \), the highest-energy occupied set is \( \pi^{\ast} 2p \) (it has 4 electrons). Removing one gives:

  • \(\pi^{\ast} 2p\): 3 electrons

All lower orbitals stay the same.

Step 3: Use the bond order formula

The bond order is calculated by:

\[
\text{Bond order} = \frac{N_b – N_a}{2}
\]

where \(N_b\) is the total number of electrons in bonding MOs and \(N_a\) is the total number of electrons in antibonding MOs.

Step 4: Count bonding and antibonding electrons for \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \)

Bonding molecular orbitals (bonding set):

  • \(\sigma 2s\) (2 electrons)
  • \(\pi 2p\) (4 electrons)
  • \(\sigma 2p\) (2 electrons)

So:

\[
N_b = 2 + 4 + 2 = 8
\]

Antibonding molecular orbitals (antibonding set):

  • \(\sigma^{\ast} 2s\) (2 electrons)
  • \(\pi^{\ast} 2p\) (3 electrons in \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \))

So:

\[
N_a = 2 + 3 = 5
\]

Step 5: Compute the bond order

\[
\text{Bond order} = \frac{8 – 5}{2} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5
\]

Final Answer

The bond order of \( \mathrm{F_2^+} \) is \(1.5\).

See full solution
image
Struggling with bond order? Try our AI homework help!
AI homework helper

General Chemistry FAQs

What is the bond order of \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) using valence molecular orbital (MO) theory?

\( \mathrm{F_2} \) has bond order \(1\). \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) removes one electron from the antibonding \( \sigma^* \) level, so bond order decreases to \( \frac{1}{2} \times (N_b-N_a)=\frac{1}{2}\).

How do I compute bond order from MO electron counts for \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \)?

Count electrons in bonding MOs as \(N_b\) and antibonding MOs as \(N_a\). Then bond order \(= \frac{1}{2}(N_b-N_a)\). For \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \), the net result is \(0.5\).

Why does adding/removing an electron change bond order for \( \mathrm{F_2} \) and \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \)?

Electrons in bonding MOs increase bond order; electrons in antibonding MOs decrease it. Ionization to \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) removes an electron from an antibonding MO, lowering bond order from \(1\) to \(0.5\).

Which molecular orbital loses the electron when forming \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \)?

The electron is removed from the highest occupied molecular orbital, which for \( \mathrm{F_2} \) is an antibonding \( \sigma^* \) level. Removing it reduces \(N_a\), thus lowering bond order.

What is the qualitative bond strength and bond length trend for \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) compared to \( \mathrm{F_2} \)?

Since bond order drops from \(1\) to \(0.5\), the bond is weaker in \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \). Weaker bond means longer bond length than \( \mathrm{F_2} \).

Is \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) expected to be stable or can it dissociate easily?

With bond order \(0.5\), \( \mathrm{F_2^{+}} \) has a significantly weaker bond than \( \mathrm{F_2} \). It can be less stable and more prone to dissociation, though stability depends on overall energetics.
Use AI tools for F2+.
Find its bond order fast.
image
301,983+ active customers
Analytical, General, Biochemistry, etc.
top
Upgrade to Edubrain Premium
Unlimited help across all subjects
$16
$3.99
/week
Core benefits:
  • ok Unlimited AI homework help
  • ok A+ quality answers
  • ok Faster responses, no limits
Tools:
  • ok Notes generator
  • ok Diagram generator
  • ok AI detector and humanizer
Extras:
  • ok Ad-free experience
  • ok Share responses with others
  • ok Advanced reasoning
expert
Expert-level help at discounted prices
Cancel anytime
Star
4.6Trusted by 14,623 students
🚀 Upgrade Plan
You’ve reached the free limit of 5 slides.
To generate a full presentation, please subscribe.
Unlock with subscription:
  • ok Unlimited slide generation for presentations
  • ok AI-designed, well-structured slide content
  • ok Faster workflow for bigger decks
-
Plus, get unlimited access to:
  • ok Diagram Generator, Flashcard Maker, Notes Generator, Research Assistant, Answer Generator, AI Homework Helper & AI Detector
  • ok Discounted designer expert help
Star
4.6Trusted by 14,623 students